4/16/09 Dear Little Dot, You were going to call me about Gramma's car... dad |
12/28/09 Dear M & K, Grandma Evelyn is gone. She was a trooper in life, a trooper as a secretary for MI9 in Egypt during WWII and a trooper in her last years. She left quickly on the morning of Christmas Eve. Perhaps we can honor her by calling the day Christmas Evelyn from now on. dad |
Aug '10 The reason for a young woman to be protective of her procreational activities from wooing to screwing, from courting to cavorting, was in the past std's and unwanted pregnancy. With the advent of easy birth prevention and antibiotics and blockers and such-- and assuming 100% efficacy for these--, is there still any reason anybody but fools would want to promote chasteness in young women and respect for this from young men? How about the importance of children and the chance for either an enhanced or a deteriorated future civilization based on quality of parents? "Little to win but nothin' to lose" * passes right up the line from prepubescent experimentation through prom night through graduation day (graduation from gratification of the flesh to gratification of procreative and societal imperatives) * Strawberry Alarm Clock c.1967 P.S. When I wrote this I was still thinking I had nothing but daughters to worry about, screwing up their endocrine systems, kidneys &/or livers just to pleasure some scrofulous BOYS... |
11/20/10 Organized Religion The Only Kind; Multiple but finite horizons: sex getting in the way. To ask myself the question whether-- on some non-physical plane-- I have some sort of existence, is to have that existence. To forbid the asking is to throw oneself onto the trash heap of abject materialism. It's similar to discovering one is not an antisocial personality by noticing that one wonders whether one is an antisocial personality. Later: A "Spirit Universe" is to me just a model or representation suggesting that there is a hierarchy of horizons when you are considering whether or not you are surviving well, not so well, adrift, or just about to get creamed any instant now, e.g.: Marriage. Marriage is the real thing, a long term procreative relationship. Sex is easier, more available, more simple-minded. But what about the possibility of 'in the moment' sex getting IN THE WAY of a long term procreative relationship? Horizons are a way of thinking of looking farther off. Who was it that decided there was no horizon beyond what could be weighed, measured and prodded? Later still-- No organized religion: "I'm not close enough to you to discuss the grander implications, so we're really just stuck here in the sucky-fucky first valley. Maybe someone or something will pull our viewpoint up onto the next 'ridge'?" Organized religion: "As unpleasant as it may be, i'm obligated by my relationship with my old Sunday School (Catechism, Shul, Moslem-equivalent) Teacher to at least acknowledge the existence of longer-range survival goals and, if possible, consider the possibility of discussing them earlier rather than later..." * * * I, as a father, would be foolish to volunteer my answers to these questions before being asked; there is no magical entree for me unless maybe to put on my best cryptic face and say something along the lines of "What will you tell YOUR children?"(uhohi'vesaidtoomuch,ihaven't saidenoughrem?) |
3/17/12 PEDO file (after C's response to my CC'ed email trying to convey my attitude about abortion on a 'feelings' level) The point is, we, i.e. this extended family, are a complex system wherein every member has to, in real time, intellectually, be ready to 'hit the deck running' when the group's stability, wellbeing or survival becomes more-rather than-less questionable. But you posit that you or some intellectual brethren high in academic circles has come up with an algorithm that has a bottom line answer to any problem the group has, at any granularity and at any point in the group's history, past-present-future. (really, isn't the ultimate intention here that these matters can then be run by proxies like gummint functionaries without the necessity of any monitoring by group members) And surprise, surprise, one of the answers which come out of the punch card printer, which you then have to defend because you "know" it's "correct," is-- remarkably, hysterically even-- termed an abomination by some myopic non-visionaries And this is a possible explanation of why one finds perfectly kindly and rational people defending shady backroom practices recognizable as such by anyone over the age of, say, 5, arrived at with neat perfection through an unassailable calculus and checked time and again by experts in the latest models and possessed of the latest real world data. Sometimes intuitive or dare I say spiritual explanations are ones that throw light and 'scientific-rationalistic,' dare I say materialistic, is where the darkness is born. |