Who_We.html |
destructive or deadly to "revolutionize." Oct 2010 Black skin is genetic, but as far as I am concerned gay will always be behavioral unless and until the elusive "gay gene" is mapped. What this means is that there is a substantive divide between black requests that the nation take concrete actions to forward their "civil rights", and GLT claims of a logically parallel forwarding of their desire to participate in what we call marriage, heretofore an institution put forward by a multiplicity of groups, but always about a man, a woman and any children they might produce (and a natural and simple primal building block upon which to develop human cultures from australopithecus on.) Marriage is about behavior and no form of black involvement fundamentally changes marriage because color is a whole different arena from behavior. The behavior I'm discussing is a couple protecting (and thereby benefitting the broader culture) the development of the easily disrupted children issuing from them-- and spare me the shrill claim that samesex couples or mixed quartets and such can also raise children because that's bass-ackwards from the core reasoning that starts with the genetic pair and its progeny and proceeds to how to promote improvement of THE SPECIFIC ASSOCIATED behavior in order to benefit civilization. Even if that less than 10 percent does the best parenting in the world, the fact remains that it is the BEHAVIOR of the straight 90 percent and the fact of BABIES MAKING BABIES that is the target of marriage. Liberalizing the application of marriage to include blacks is no more than correcting a mistaken exclusion. Such liberalization affects the DEFINITION not one bit. But such is not the case with gays, who are demanding to be included when that inclusion involves the actual DESTRUCTION AND REPLACEMENT of traditional marriage with a "new", "improved", redefined institution. GLT's have been pretty good citizens as individuals as far as I can tell, but when they "lawyer up" and demand samesex marriage as a civil right, this is a harbinger I think of a deep antipathy to the way civilization has "done business" in the past, and every human including gays and lesbians should examine the brave new propositions with which they wish to supplant the old , and ask themselves if there are any behaviors fundamental to humanity's survival in advanced civilizations that it would be destructive or deadly to "revolutionize." |